Legal Opinion

Piechowiak v. Bissell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1943No. Docket No. 72, Calendar No. 42,351PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChandler, J.

The appellant’s statement of facts in his brief is so concise and comprehensive, and being conceded by appellee to be correct, we quote the same:

“The plaintiff and appellant is a resident of Bay City, Michigan. The Alert Pipe & Supply Company is a Michigan corporation, with its principal office at Bay City, Michigan. The defendant is the president of the corporation and resides at Bay City, Michigan.

‘ ‘ On May 7,1917, the plaintiff entered into the employ of the Alert Pipe & Supply Company as a bookkeeper. At that time, E. J. Bissell, the father of the defendant, owned all the stock of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. PiechowiakMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Mack v. SharpMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Thick v. WasherMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Doak v. SpringsteadMichigan Supreme Court · 1938

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Orzel v. Scott Drug Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Manning v. Bishop of MarquetteMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Moore v. Michigan National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Kravitz v. Summersett (In re Great Lakes Comnet, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2018
  5. Blase v. AppicelliMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API