Classic Coach v. Mercado
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bracken, P. J.
The issue in this case is whether a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights (hereinafter the Commissioner), that the complainant had been subjected to an illegal discriminatory practice in violation of Executive Law § 296, is supported by substantial evidence. We conclude that it is so supported and confirm the determination.
The Commissioner found in his determination dated April 29, 1999, that the complainant, a female, and hence a member of a protected class (see, Matter of Town of Lumberland v New York State Div. of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Dennis James v. New York Racing Association, and New York State Racing & Wagering BoardCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Cynthia J. Fisher, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Vassar College, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Smalls v. Allstate InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Falbaum v. PomerantzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Beckles v. Kingsbrook Jewish Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Peskin v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Curto v. Zittel's Dairy FarmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.