Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Carter
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 12, 1950No. 981PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLAGETT, Associate Judge.
Plaintiffs purchased a speedboat from defendant for commercial use. Under two written agreements signed a few days apart, they paid defendant $570 in cash and delivered to him a. note secured by a chattel mortgage for the balance of $535. When the boat was bought, it was in defendant’s dry-dock, and plaintiffs claimed they were induced to make the purchase by defendant’s express representations that he knew it to be in first-class running condition., Shortly thereafter they tried to operate the boat but found it would run only a short distance because of defective…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Smith v. RichardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Chaperon v. Portland Electric Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Klepinger v. RhodesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Rowe v. Nolan Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
- Owen v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Partrich v. MuscatMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Kraft v. LoweDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- King v. Industrial Bank of WashingtonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
- Sheherazade, Inc. v. MardikianDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1958
- Shulman v. ShulmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.