Castelazo v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Watson, Judge:
The merchandise in the cases at bar consists of footwear having rubber soles and vinyl uppers with fur-trimmed vinyl buttons glued thereon. (Plaintiff’s exhibit 1.) The importation was classified under paragraph 1530(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the Japanese Protocol of Terms of Accession to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T.D. 53865, supplemented by T.D. 53877, at the rate of 20 per centum ad valorem as footwear with uppers in chief value of animal hair and soles wholly or in chief value of india rubber.
Plaintiff claims the merchandise properly…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marvel v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Sonn v. MagoneSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- United States v. Ben Felsenthal & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
- United States v. ShokaiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Inter-Pacific Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1984