Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Wilmer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 12, 1917PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. (Stump, X) The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

This appeal is from a decree of the Circuit Court of Baltimore City dismissing the bill of complaint of the appellant, which was filed for the purpose of having two magistrates’ judgments, recovered against him by Edwin M. Wilmer, one of the appellees, declared void and the execution thereof enjoined.

The hill alleges that the appellant was indebted to Edwin M. WTlmer “in about the sum of fifty dollars,” on a promissory note in favor of Wilmer, and that on the 24th day of April, 1894, Wilmer recovered a judgment against him on said note before Peter Targarona, a justice of the peace of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Baltimore City Passenger Railway Co. v. SewellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1873
  2. Hanley v. DonoghueCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  3. Gorsuch v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
  4. Smith Premier Typewriter Co. v. WestcottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910
  5. Horner v. PoppleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Executors of Fooks v. GhingherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  2. R. D. Johnson Milling Co. v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
  3. Wilmer v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1918
  4. Aker v. SilbaughIdaho Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API