Legal Opinion

Aker v. Silbaugh

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1941No. 6888Published

1Opinion of the CourtGivens, J.

Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal because the transcript herein was prepared by appellant appearing propria persona, not by the clerk of the district court, (though there is one clerk’s certificate attached to said transcript and another subsequently filed) hence not in accordance with Section 11-215,1. C. A., and Rule 25 of this court.

Rule 28 of this court makes the clerk of the district court responsible for the proper preparation of the transcript. Rule 26 requires strict compliance with the rules for the preparation of the transcript, which is the essence of the record on appeal, and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. PotvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Mills v. SmileyIdaho Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Domer v. StoneIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Idaho Trust Co. v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Washington County Land & Development Co. v. Weiser National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API