Consolidated Film Industries v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.
The question in this case is whether the district court erred in granting relief to appellee enjoining the United States Internal Revenue Service from enforcing a levy. A more ultimate and specific issue is whether a financing statement is required under the pertinent Uniform Commercial Code provision, Utah Statutes, Section 70A-9-302(l)(e), Utah Code (1968), which section relates to requiring the filing of a financing statement in order to perfect security interests. This in turn is dependent upon construction of the exemption provision contained in the above…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. Wells Fargo Bank International Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1975
- Craig v. GudimWyoming Supreme Court · 1971
- Standard Lumber Company v. Chamber Frames, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1970
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pride Hyundai, Inc. v. Chrysler Financial Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Black, Robertshaw, Frederick, Copple & Wright, P. C . v. United StatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
- George W. Ultch Lumber Co. v. Hall Plastering, Inc.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
- Valley Bank of Nevada v. City of HendersonDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
- In Re Tri-County Materials, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.