Legal Opinion

People v. Douglas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 7, 2006PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Gonzalez, J.

A criminal defendant asserting the defense of justification is entitled to introduce evidence bearing on the reasonableness of his belief that the victim was about to use imminent deadly physical force against him (Penal Law § 35.15 [2] [a]). In this case, the trial court erred in precluding evidence that defendant was kidnapped and threatened by gang members associated with the victim the night before the shooting and in precluding evidence of the victim’s prior violent acts known to defendant, both of which were relevant to his justification defense. We also…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Perry v. LeekeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. People v. GoetzNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. GradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. People v. RamseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. People v. BellamyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. People v. BayardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API