Carey v. Bourque-Lanigan Post No. 5
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWebber, J.
This matter comes up on plaintiff’s exceptions to the direction of a verdict for defendants. The issue here presented is, “Were these exceptions regularly and properly allowed below, or should they be dismissed?”
At a regular April Term of the Superior Court below, the presiding justice directed a verdict for the defendants. Seasonably thereafter during the term, a docket entry was made of “Exceptions filed and allowed.” On the same day the presiding justice fixed the time for filing an extended bill of exceptions, and an appropriate docket entry was recorded, “Extended Bill of Exceptions to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bradford v. DavisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1947
- Dunn v. Auburn Electric Motor Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1898
- Poland v. McDowellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
- Mann v. Homestead Realty Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- Borneman v. MillikenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BeySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1965
- White v. SchofieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1957
- Carey v. CyrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1955
- Ouelette v. PageauSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967