Legal Opinion
Sierra Managed Asset Plan, LLC v. Hale
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided August 20, 2015No. 56-2013-00443856-CL-CL-VTAPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GUASCO, P. J.
Defendant and appellant, David C. Hale (appellant), appeals from a judgment entered against him and in favor of plaintiff and respondent, Sierra Managed Asset Plan, LLC (respondent), in the total sum of $10,138.41 in this limited civil collection case. Appellant argues that the trial court prejudicially erred by receiving a declaration in lieu of live testimony which was filed without complying with Code of Civil Procedure section 98. Additionally, appellant argues that the trial court abused its discretion by accepting the testimony of the declarant concerning, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jazayeri v. MaoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Aguimatang v. California State LotteryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- City of Ripon v. SweetinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Huffman v. INTERSTATE BRANDS COMPANIESCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Unifund CCR, LLC v. DearAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
- Midland Funding LLC v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
- Midland Funding v. RomeroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. SelivanovCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.