Legal Opinion
Riegel Textile Corp. v. Celanese Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 9, 1980No. 79 Civ. 3493 (WCC)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CONNER, District Judge:
Defendant Celanese Corporation (“Celanese”) has moved to dismiss the complaint in this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), F.R.Civ.P. For the reasons discussed below, this motion is granted.
Background
This is an action for lost profits, loss of good will, other damages incurred due to idling of manufacturing facilities, further related actual damages, and punitive damages in connection with plaintiff Riegel Textile Corporation’s purchase,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Butcher v. Robertshaw Controls Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Riegel Textile Corporation v. Celanese CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
- Young v. Robertshaw Controls Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1983
- Doane v. Metal Bluing Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.