Riegel Textile Corporation v. Celanese Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
This is an appeal from an order of the Hon. William C. Conner, dismissing plaintiff’s complaint, based upon federal and state law claims, for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. We affirm.
Plaintiff Riegel is in the business of manufacturing and processing fabrics and garments including children’s sleepwear. Defendant Celanese manufactures synthetic fibers.
In 1972, Celanese advised Riegel that it had developed a flame-retardant synthetic fiber (treated with TRIS), suitable for the manufacture of children’s sleepwear. 1 After conducting its own…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Transamerica Mortgage Advisors, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Vito Milanese, Jr. And Suzanne Milanese v. Rust-Oleum CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Mora v. People of State of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Sparks v. Metalcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1987
- Thomas Davis v. United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.