Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Parker, Covert & Chidester

California Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2002No. S097444PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

123 Cal.Rptr.2d 19 (2002)

28 Cal.4th 811

50 P.3d 733

Raul WILSON et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

PARKER, COVERT & CHIDESTER et al., Defendants and Respondents. Raul Wilson et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Mark Williams, Defendant and Respondent. Raul Wilson et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,

v.

Carl Axup et al., Defendants and Respondents.

No. S097444.

Supreme Court of California.

August 1, 2002.

Rehearing Denied October 2, 2002.

Law Offices of Yvonne M. Renfrew and Yvonne M. Renfrew, Santa Monica, for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Armen L. George, in pro. per., and, for Alan D. Barbour and Miyoko…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Porous Media Corporation v. Pall CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
  5. In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Travelers Casualty Insurance Co. of America v. HirshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API