Jensen v. Alaska Valuation Service, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
In this petition we are asked to decide whether the use of corporate checks is sufficient, in and of itself, to inform the recipient of the checks that it deals with a corporation rather than an individual. Although the monetary value of this case is inconsequential, we agreed to hear it because the question at issue is likely to recur. Alaska R.App.P. 304. We hold that the question is ultimately one of fact, and conclude that the trial court did not err in finding that in this case corporate checks did not provide sufficient notice of the existence of a corporation.
I.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Potter v. ChaneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
- Myers-Leiber Sign Co. v. WeirichCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Matsko v. DallyWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Diamond Match Co. v. CruteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Brown v. Owen Litho Service, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Ranes & Shine, LLC v. MacDonald Miller Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2015
- Beal v. McGuireAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Water, Waste & Land, Inc. v. LanhamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- Benjamin Plumbing, Inc. v. BarnesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Agrisource, Inc. v. JohnsonIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.