Legal Opinion

Agrisource, Inc. v. Johnson

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 2014No. 40340PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURDICK, Chief Justice.

Robert Johnson (“Johnson”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Agrisource, Inc. (“Agrisource”) on Agrisource’s breach of contract claim. The Bonneville County district court held that there was no genuine disputed issue of material fact as to Johnson’s lack of disclosure of *906his agency and alleged principal. Johnson argues on appeal that Agrisource had notice that Johnson was the principal’s agent because Agrisource should have known Johnson was an agent and disputed issues of fact existed. Johnson also appeals the district court’s denial…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Hayward v. YostIdaho Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Blimka v. My Web Wholesaler, LLC.Idaho Supreme Court · 2007
  3. O'Connor v. Harger Construction, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Coeur D'Alene Mining Co. v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Eby v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Frontier Development Group, LLC v. CaravellaIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Alan Golub v. Kirk-Scott, LTDIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  3. John Wickel v. David J. Chamberlain, D.O.Idaho Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Alan Golub v. Kirk-Hughes DevelopmentIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Franklin Building Supply v. Aaron HymasIdaho Supreme Court · 2014

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API