Legal Opinion · Dissent

Dittrich v. West

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided January 6, 1998No. 96-1590Published

1Dissent

STEINBERG and KRAMER, Judges,

dissenting:

We voted for en banc review of the panel opinion in this case (issued on January 6, 1998) and of the proposal that briefing be sought by the en banc Court or the panel on the issue of the effect of the enactment, while this case was pending on appeal, of Pub.L. No. 105-111, 111 Stat. 2271 (Nov. 21, 1997) (regarding clear and unmistakable error (CUE) claims), on the doctrine of “delayed subsuming” as adopted in Donovan v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 404, 407-08 (1997), and Chisem v. Gober, 10 Vet.App. 526, 528 (1997).

The panel opinion in this case disposes of a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Karnas v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  2. William A. Smith, Claimant-Appellee v. Jesse Brown, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Vda de Landicho v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. Cerullo v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  5. Donovan v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API