Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clement v. O'MALLEY

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 16, 1981No. 79-1665Published

1Dissent

Mr. PRESIDING JUSTICE SULLIVAN,

dissenting:

While I concur in the finding of the majority that the construction of the driving range in Jackson Park was a proper park purpose, I do not agree with its holding that the Inter-Agency Referral Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 24, par 11 — 12—4.1) (IARA) should govern the outcome of the present case.

The majority correctly points out that section 11 — 48.2—2 of the municipal code (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1969, ch. 24, par. 11 — 48.2—2) (1969 Act) continues to apply to the city, but it gives no indication as to how it reached the conclusion that the Lakefront…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Franzese v. TrinkoIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Petterson v. City of NapervilleIllinois Supreme Court · 1956
  3. People Ex Rel. Scott v. Illinois Racing BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1973
  4. People Ex Rel. Community High School District No. 231 v. HupeIllinois Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago v. City of Des PlainesIllinois Supreme Court · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API