Legal Opinion
Baldwin S. Moy v. Howard University
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 19, 1988No. 87-7100PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion PER CURIAM.
2Per curiam
Appellant Baldwin S. Moy appealed a district court order granting summary judgment for appellee Howard University (“University”). The University contends that Moy’s appeal is untimely. Under the relevant procedural rules, we conclude that the appeal is timely.
I
On September 19, 1985, Moy filed an action in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, alleging that the University breached its employment contract with him. On October 23, 1986, the University moved for summary judgment. Moy filed no opposition. By order filed December 31, 1986, the district…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Emerson Emory v. Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Donna L. Nichols v. Board of Trustees of the Asbestos Workers Local 24 Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Mercilyn Buchanan v. Stanships, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
4Cited by15 opinions
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees, Nathaniel McQueen Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Thanh Vong Hoai v. Thanh Van VoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
- Andre C. Derrington-Bey v. District of Columbia Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Johnny Richardson v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- English-Speaking Un v. Johnson, JamesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.