Legal Opinion

State v. McClennon

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 25, 1984PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TATUM, Judge.

The defendant, Paul McClennon, has appealed from a conviction of receiving stolen property with punishment fixed at not less nor more than 3 years imprisonment. He presents issue that the trial court erred in permitting an amendment of the indictment and in refusing him a continuance. We find no merit in these issues and affirm the judgment below.

We first address the issue that the trial court erred in permitting the State to amend the indictment. The defendant was convicted of violating the First Count of the indictment. That count charged the defendant with receiving…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. KnightTennessee Supreme Court · 1981
  2. State v. ZylaCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1981
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1978

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brandon Mobley v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Parham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  3. State v. GilmoreCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
  4. State v. RubioCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  5. State v. StokesTennessee Supreme Court · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API