Legal Opinion

United States ex rel. Picicci v. District Director of Immigration & Naturalization

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 17, 1950No. Nos. 161-162, Dockets 21553, 21554PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The statute, 8 U.S.C.A. § 136(1) provides that stowaways shall be excluded but that, “if otherwise admissible,” they “may be ■admitted in the discretion of the Attorney General.” The parties to these appeals appear to agree that the orders of the Board of Special Inquiry, in directing the rela-*306tors’ exclusion, held, in. effect, that relators were not “otherwise admissible.”

8 U.S.C.A. § 136(q)-provides'that' the Commissioner, with the approval of the Attorney General, shall issue regulations “to control and regulate the admission and return of otherwise inadmissible aliens…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Mastrapasqua v. Shaughnessy, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  3. Tod v. WaldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States Ex Rel. Di Paola v. ReimerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. United States Ex Rel. Mazur v. Commissioner of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Ex Rel. Picicci v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at Port of New York. United States Ex Rel. Rizzi v. District Director of Immigration and Naturalization at Port of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API