Legal Opinion

National Docks & New Jersey Junction Connecting Railway Co. v. State

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Oil error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of the Supreme Court, see 23 Vroom 90.

1Per curiam

The judges voting to reverse the judgment of the-Supreme-Court in the above entitled cause concur in the- opinion delivered by the Chancellor, except so far as it hold's the petition to be defective. Deeming the petition sufficient,, we think the-judgment below should be reversed.

The Chancellor.

The plaintiff in error- was organized’ in pursuance of the provisions of the act to “ authorize the-formation of railroad corporations and regulate the same,”' approved April 2d, 1873 (Rev., p. 925), and its supplements,, known as the General Railroad law, for the purpose of building a railroad, about…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wilentz v. HendricksonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  2. Stockton v. Central RailroadNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1892
  3. Packard v. Bergen Neck Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  4. West Jersey & Seashore Railroad v. Atlantic City & Suburban Traction Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904
  5. Morris & Essex Railroad v. City of OrangeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API