Legal Opinion

Morris & Essex Railroad v. City of Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 26, 1899PublishedCited by 10 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

This writ of error is sued out by the city of Orange to review the judgment of the Supreme Court in the ease of State, Morris and Essex Railroad Co. and the Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., pros., v. Mayor and Common Council of the City of Orange, on eertiorari, setting aside an assessment of damages and for benefits in laying out and opening Hickory street from South Main street to Parrow street.

By an ordinance adopted January 4th, 1892, the city council laid out Hickory street within termini named, crossing the railroad of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. The Albany Northern Railroad Company v. . BrownellNew York Court of Appeals · 1862
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1892

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. North American Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1915
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ShelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  3. City of Grafton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. RhodesIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Penna.-Reading Seashore Lines v. Bd. Pub. Util.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API