Legal Opinion

Gilham Electric Co. v. Daniel

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided August 29, 1931No. 20889Published

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

Under the law governing garnishments in this State, such a proceeding can be instituted where a suit is pending or judgment has been obtained (Civil Code (1910), § 5265), where ordinary attachments are pending (Civil Code, § 5094), and where purchase-money attachments are issued (Civil Code, § 5086); but under the provisions of the last-named section, and under the rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court, an attachment for purchase-money under the Civil Code, § 5086, can not be levied by garnishment except for the proceeds of all or some portion of the property described in the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McAndrew v. Irish-American BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Baker v. Aultman & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  3. Watters & Co. v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  4. Reid v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876
  5. Ivey v. KerceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API