Legal Opinion

Ivey v. Kerce

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 12, 1930No. 20386PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. It is the general rule that a defendant in fi. fa. can not go behind the judgment by an affidavit of illegality, where he has been properly served or has made actual appearance. Civil Code (1910), § 5311. But where the judgment is not merely voidable, but wholly void, as where the court was entirely and under all circumstances without jurisdiction, affidavit of illegality is always a proper mode of attacking an execution issued on the -judgment so obtained. Harrell v. Davis Wagon Co., 140 Ga. 127 (78 S. E. 713); Williamson v. Williamson, 154 Ga. 788 (115 S. E. 805) ; Cochran v. Whitworth,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cochran v. WhitworthCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  2. Harrell v. Davis Wagon Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1913
  3. Williamson v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  4. Reid v. TuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1876

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. Southern Flour & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  2. Gilham Electric Co. v. DanielCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API