Legal Opinion

Marble Sav. Bank of Rutland v. Davis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1934No. 4591PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEVI, Justice.

The appellee brought the suit against the appellant bank seeking, upon the alleged ground of usurious contract, to have payments of interest on the principal sum previously made by her or for her benefit applied in discharge of the balance of $1,300 on the principal note originally for $2,350 with interest; to cancel the deed of trust on sixty-five acres of land-executed to secure payment of the note and interest; to remove from the land the cloud east upon the title.

The appellant answered by general denial, and by way of cross-action sought judgment on the note with foreclosure…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bothwell v. Farmers & Merchants State Bank & Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Spiller v. BellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marble Savings Bank v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  3. Cade v. Union Central Life Ins.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API