Legal Opinion

Marble Savings Bank v. Davis

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1935No. 6731PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge GERMAN

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals.

This case was upon an agreed statement of facts and the sole question for decision is one of usury. The trial court held the contract was usurious and its judgment was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals. 69 S. W. (2d) 812. A full statement of facts is found in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, and we set out here only such provisions of the contract as will enable us to dispose of the question for decision.

The principal note was dated February 1, 1922. It was for the sum of $2,350.00, payable January 1, 1933, with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dugan v. LewisTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lincoln National Life Insurance v. AndersonTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Bankers' Life Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. National Life Ass'n v. BerkeleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1899
  5. Marble Sav. Bank of Rutland v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Smart v. Tower Land & Investment Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Mack v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  4. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. v. SchuenemannTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Sharpe v. Lomas & Nettleton Financial Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API