Legal Opinion
Gellert v. State
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided June 3, 1974No. 2006 and 2018PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOR, Justice.
This appeal involves interpretation of the “one-subject rule” set forth in Article II, Section 13, of the Alaska Constitution.
In 1972 the Alaska Legislature enacted a bill entitled:
“An Act Providing for the Issuance of general obligation bonds in the amount of $20,000,000 for the purpose of paying the cost of capital improvements for flood control and small boat harbor projects ; and providing for an effective date.”
The body of the act read in part:
“For the purpose of paying the cost of state participation in capital improve*1121ments for flood control projects as provided…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- Keeting v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1957
- Washington Toll Bridge Authority v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- Suber v. Alaska State Bond CommitteeAlaska Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Evans Ex Rel. Kutch v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- North Slope Borough v. Sohio Petroleum Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- New Jersey Association on Correction v. LanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.