Legal Opinion

Reeves v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 28, 2000No. A00A0059PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Richard Hoyt Reeves was tried before a jury and found guilty of trafficking amphetamine. His amended motion for new trial was denied, and this appeal followed. He enumerates the sufficiency of the evidence and the failure of the trial court to instruct the jury on whether a witness for the State was an accomplice whose testimony-required corroboration. Viewed in the light most favorable to the jury’s verdict, the evidence showed the following.

Undercover Investigator Stidd made two purchases of methamphetamine from Peggy Sue Thomas and then arranged for Thomas to sell him four…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  3. Robinson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  4. Selvidge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
  5. Garvin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sutton v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2014
  2. Goldsby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  3. Gilmore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. Krauss v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  5. Torres v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API