Legal Opinion
Sergentakis v. Channell
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided August 23, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-11101-DHHPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Hennessy, M.J.
Defendant Dr.' Shawn Channell has moved to dismiss pro se Plaintiff Kris Ser-gentakis’s complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to exhaust administrative remedies under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), and for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Docket # 27). Sergentakis filed an opposition thereto. (Docket # 29). These matters are now ripe for adjudication. In consideration of the foregoing submissions and for the reasons that follow, Defendant Chan-nell’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket #27) is…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Booth v. ChurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Belmont v. BowerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020
- Coccoli, Sr. v. D'AgostinoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2020
- Culley v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Grannum v. EvangelidisDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2019
- Hubbard v. Alku, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.