Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Walter

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1970No. Calendar 9, Docket 52,327PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, J.

(for reversal). The stated and accepted question for review is presented by counsel as follows :

“Did the circuit court err in not allowing plaintiff’s counsel to ask defendant about his driving record after defendant denied that he had ever been arrested and convicted of a crime ?”

The question arose below and is brought here upon this portion of the record. Plaintiff’s counsel is cross-examining:

“Q. Mr. Walter, have you ever been arrested or convicted of a crime?
“A. No.
“Q. No?
“A. What do you mean, ‘arrested or convicted’?
“Q. Of a crime?
“A. Of a crime, no.
“Q. Mr. Walter, on June the 9th, 1963,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Perin v. PeulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wilbur v. FloodMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
  4. People v. HanrahanMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Ando v.WoodberryNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. FarrarMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Sting v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Hughes v. PolkMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. People v. SessonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  5. Birznieks v. CooperMichigan Supreme Court · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API