United States v. King
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION
FULTON, Judge.
Contrary to his plea the appellant was convicted of larceny of a Sony television from a fellow enlisted man in violation of Article 121 UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 921. The sentence approved below provides for a suspended bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for two months, and reduction to pay grade E-l.
Appellant contends the following prejudiced his cause:
I. THE STAFF JUDGE ADVOCATE’S REVIEW IS PREJUDICIALLY INADEQUATE.
II. THE PUNITIVE DISCHARGE SHOULD BE DISAPPROVED IN THAT THE COURT MEMBERS IMPEACHED THAT PORTION OF THE SENTENCE AWARDING THE DISCHARGE.
I
REVIEW
The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
- United States v. KaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. GrcichUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
- United States v. HooperUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
- United States v. StoryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. WordenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
- United States v. MillerU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1984