Legal Opinion

United States v. Hooper

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided January 15, 1960No. 11,113PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Robert E. Quinn, Chief Judge:

This case is before us for the second time. On the first appeal, we upheld the accused’s amenability to trial by court-martial as a retired officer of the United States Navy; and found no merit in any of his assignments of error, except one. The exception pertained to the sufficiency of the post-trial review by the staff legal officer to the Commandant, 11th Naval District. The Government conceded error and our examination of the review supported the concession. Accordingly, we set aside the decision of the board of review and returned the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BennieUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1959
  2. United States v. SulewskiUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. BrooksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
  2. United States v. CashUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  3. United States v. BlackwellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. CurryU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. StevensonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API