Legal Opinion
Ferme Rimouski, Inc. v. Limousin West, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided October 24, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-K-269PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
In this diversity action, Ferme Rimouski claims that Jerry Robbe, Deborah Robbe, Limousin West 1 and Robbe Limousin wrongfully converted some heifers and their progeny. Jerry and Deborah Robbe move to dismiss the case for three reasons: (1) lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the amount in controversy does not exceed $10,000; (2) Rimouski’s claim under section 18-4-405 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (1973) fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; and (3) Ri-mouski has failed to join an indispensable party. For the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Arkansas Valley Land & Cattle Co. v. MannSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Western Union Telegraph Co. v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- H. R. Gibson, Sr., D/B/A Gibson Products Company v. Clinton E. Jeffers, Commissioner of Agriculture, State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Plus System, Inc. v. New England Network, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- Equimed, Inc. v. GenstlerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Lorenzo Gonzalez v. FerrerTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 1998
- People v. ClaytonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986