Kreielsheimer v. Gill
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered November 25, 1914, upon findings in favor of the defendant, in an action upon a rejected claim against an estate, after a trial to the court.
1Opinion of the CourtChadwick, J.
-The trial judge found the following facts: In July, 1909, Berryman & Pinschower were indebted to the appellants in the sum of $471.17. They sold their business to Peyser and Bethel. As a part of the purchase price, Peyser and Bethel agreed to pay some debts of the firm of Berryman & Pinschower, including the debt due appellants. Peyser and Bethel did not meet these payments, and Berry-man & Pinschower then requested appellants to assign their claim against Berryman & Pinschower to one Welch for the purpose of bringing a suit to recover the amount due them and the amount assumed by Peyser and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Newton v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1882
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peterson v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Marcum v. Richmond Auto Parts Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Peterson v. GrovesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
- Bain v. WallaceWashington Supreme Court · 1932
- Marshall-Wells Hardware Co. v. Title Guaranty & Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.