Legal Opinion

Colorado Wool Marketing Ass'n v. Monaghan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided July 26, 1933No. 826PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

Appellant loaned $3,190.00 to a receiver of a band of sheep, which was all expended in feeding and earing for them pending the litigation. The trial court disallowed $1,754.57 entirely, and postponed $1,435.43 to the mortgage lien of the appellee, The Wasatch Livestock Loan Company, which will hereafter be referred to as appellee. Since the sheep sold for less than the mortgage, appellant was denied any real relief. A statement of the facts and a consideration of one or two well settled principles of law will disclose that appellant’s position is impregnable.

The…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Palmer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  4. Atlantic Trust Co. v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  5. Wallace v. LoomisSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Avorn Dress Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935
  2. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Coyle v. SkirvinCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
  4. Hart v. Ed-Ley Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Schreiber v. Ditch Road InvestorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API