Legal Opinion

Niemann v. Vaughn Community Church

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided October 21, 2003No. 29049-9-IIPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBridgewater, J.

Vaughn Community Church (VCC) has an existing church building and would like to sell it to construct a larger, more modern church nearby; but the trust controlling the property appears to prohibit the sale. When Joyce Niemann sought to enforce the trust language, *828VCC sought equitable remedies to enable the sale. Niemann appeals the trial court’s ruling that the language in the deed that VCC is to “HOLD said property for the perpetual use of the Protestant Evangelical Churches of the Community of Vaughn, Washington” is an unreasonable and discriminatory restraint on alienation and void under…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Bennett v. HardyWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Isla Verde International Holdings, Inc. v. City of CamasWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. First Covenant Church of Seattle v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Niemann v. Vaughn Community ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Committee of Tort Litigants v. Catholic Diocese of Spokane (In Re the Catholic Bishop of Spokane)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Washington · 2005
  4. Bowden v. Structured Investments Co. (In Re Bowden)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API