Legal Opinion

Munson v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1900PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Demurrer to answer.

1Opinion of the CourtDavy, J.

This is a demurrer to that portion of defendant’s answer which alleges that the Glens Falls Insurance Company and the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society of England are proper and necessary parties to this action.

The answer for a second, separate and distinct defense to the cause of action alleged in the complaint, states that the promises in the complaint described had been, and were at the time of the alleged destruction by fire, insured against loss or damage in sums unknown to the defendant by the Glens Falls Insurance Company, and by the Norwich Union Fire Insurance Society of England;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Crane v. . PowellNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
  3. Chapman v. . ForbesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Connecticut Fire Insurance v. Erie Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1878

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sellman v. HaddockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Porter v. Lane Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  3. Jacobs v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  4. Sisson v. HassettNew York Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Allen & Arnink Auto Renting Co. v. United Traction Co., New York County Courts1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API