Legal Opinion

Hudson City Savings Bank v. Woodard

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 2017Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Lawrence H. Ecker, J.

In this residential foreclosure action, defendant seeks to set aside the referee’s sale, and prevent the conveyance of the mortgaged premises to the intervenor, who was the nonparty purchaser at the referee’s sale. There is no dispute among the parties that the sale was properly conducted by the referee on March 9, 2017, or that the upset price was not reasonably related to the fair value of the subject property. Rather, defendant argues that he was mistakenly led to believe that based upon a conversation he, and his attorney, each separately had with…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Guardian Loan Co. v. EarlyNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB v. ZapalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  3. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. TestaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  4. Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. New York Financial & Mortgage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API