George Peters v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Per curiam
By motion under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255, appellant sought to have the sentence against him vacated on the grounds (1) that his conviction rested on illegal search and seizure, and (2) that his plea of guilty was induced by representation of his counsel that the United States Attorney’s office “had assured” that he would not receive a sentence of more than three years.
Appellant, represented by employed counsel, had pleaded guilty to two counts in an indictment charging (a) the transporting in interstate commerce of a check protector for use in falsely making securities, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Austin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
- Audilio Carrillo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
- Albert Lonzo Cantrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Robert G. Cox v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.