Legal Opinion
Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 12, 2010No. 09-CA-343PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUDE G. GRAVOIS, Judge.
12The plaintiffs in this wage dispute action, Gary Bell, Nick Cammarata and Mike DeHarde (“plaintiffs”), are former employees of the defendants, Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. and Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. of Louisiana (“defendants”). In their pleadings, plaintiffs claim that they are due additional bonuses wages from defendants for 2005 and 2006 under defendants’ Profit Sharing Plan, and since such additional bonus wages were not timely paid, they are also entitled to penalties and attorneys’ fees under the Louisiana Wage Claim Act, LSA-R.S. 23:631, et seq. A bench…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matthews v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Harrison v. First National Funeral Homes, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1971
- Thomas v. DeJohn's Plumbing & Heating Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1979
- Harrison v. First National Funeral Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kaplon v. RIMKUS CONSULTING GROUP, INC.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010
- Calamia v. Core Labs., LPLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Bell v. Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2010