Rodney L. Stewart v. Robert F. Parratt, Warden, Nebraska State Penitentiary
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Due to the presence of exhausted and unexhausted claims in the original petition for a writ of habeas corpus, we have asked the parties to address the applicability to this case of Rose v. Lundy, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1198, 71 L.Ed.2d 379 (1982). Both parties have indicated to this court that a remand is necessary for the purpose of allowing the district court to consider this case in light of Rose v. Lundy. We, therefore, order such a remand.
We believe the petitioner should make the choice whether to amend his petition and delete the unexhausted claims or to proceed in state court on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
3Cited by16 opinions
- Robert Gray Graham v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Lester Matlock v. James Rose, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Quinton Bowen v. State of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- State v. StewartNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
- Rodney K. Burns v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.