Legal Opinion
Quinton Bowen v. State of Tennessee
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided January 14, 1983No. 81-5386PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KRUPANSKY, Circuit Judge.
Quinton Bowen (Bowen) here appeals from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 by the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee. The district court, upon motion of the respondent State of Tennessee (State), dismissed one of Bowen’s claims for relief as unexhausted in the state courts and therefore beyond review in the Federal habeas proceedings. However, notwithstanding the presence of such an unexhausted allegation in the original petition, the district court adjudicated the merits of the exhausted…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Arthur Houston v. W. J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Linver Jenkins v. Preston L. Fitzberger, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1971
- United States of America Ex Rel. Thomas Trantino v. Robert Hatrack, Superintendent, New Jersey State Prison at RahwayCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Sweet v. CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Robert A. Prather v. John Rees, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Thomas Koontz, Cross v. Richard Glossa and William J. Brown, CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- William Lee Thompson v. Louie L. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- Wilbert C. Haggins v. Warden, Fort Pillow State FarmCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
- Robert Gray Graham v. Herman Solem, Warden, South Dakota State Penitentiary, and Mark v. Meierhenry, Attorney General, State of South DakotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.