Legal Opinion
Hamilton & Spiegel, Inc. v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided December 16, 1963No. [No. 138, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
Technical Engineers and Contractors, Inc. (Technical) agreed by a written contract to build a school for the Board of Education of Montgomery County (the Board). The United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company (the Bonding Company) became surety on the payment bond required by Code (1963 Cum. Supp.), Art. 90, Sec. 11. Appellant, Hamilton and Spiegel, Inc. (Hamilton), a roofing and sheet metal contractor, supplied material and labor for the school building at the request of the prime contractor.
To recover a claimed unpaid balance of $3,501.82, Hamilton brought suit against Technical, the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Quillen v. KelleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- MacKubin v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1948
- Marlboro Shirt Co. v. American District Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Joseph F. Hughes & Co. v. Harry S. Mickey, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1962
3Cited by36 opinions
- Alternatives Unlimited, Inc. v. New Baltimore City Board of School CommissionersCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Shillman v. HobstetterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1968
- CR-RSC Tower I, LLC v. RSC Tower I, LLCCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Everhart v. MilesCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1980
- Safer v. PerperCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.