Legal Opinion

Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikalari T.A.Ş. v. United States Int'l Trade Comm'n

United States Court of International Trade

Decided July 22, 2024No. 22-00350Published

1Opinion of the Court

Court No. 22-00350 Page 2 Brackemyre, Wiley Rein LLP, of Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor Nucor Corporation, Stephen P. Vaughn, Neal Reynolds, and Barbara Medrado, King & Spalding LLP, of Washington, D.C., for defendant-intervenor Cleveland-Cliffs Inc., and Thomas M. Beline and Sarah E. Shulman, Cassidy Levy Kent LLP, of Washington D.C., for defendant-intervenor United States Steel Corporation. Reif, Judge: Before the court is the motion to dismiss of defendant U.S. International Trade Commission (the “Commission”). Plaintiff Ereğli Demir ve Çelik Fabrikaları T.A.Ş. (“plaintiff” or…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Powell v. McCormackSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Amoco Oil Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. PPG Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1987

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API