Legal Opinion

In Re Jeane v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1949No. 30908PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMallery, J.

This case presents a single question of law: What is the statutory penalty for violating Rem. Rev. Stat., § 2601-2 [P.P.C. § 116-41], which reads as follows:

“Any person who shall with intent to defraud make, or draw, or utter, or deliver to another person any check, or draft, on a bank or other depository for the payment of money, knowing at the time of such drawing, or delivery, that he has not sufficient funds in, or credit with said bank or depository, to meet said check, in full upon its presentation, shall he guilty of larceny. . . .” (Italics ours.)

This statute, chapter 156, p. 460,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BradleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Huffman v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. State v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
  3. In Re Moon v. CranorWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State v. DennisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  5. Penrod v. CochranSupreme Court of Florida · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API