Legal Opinion · Dissent

Nolan v. Borkowski

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 15, 1988No. 13236Published

1DissentCallahan, J.

I respectfully take issue with the result reached by the majority because it is contrary to the principles regarding summary judgment and to the case law discussed in the majority’s opinion. It is clear from the opinion that the majority followed the erroneous logic of the trial court that resulted in an impermissible shift of the initial burden in a summary judgment motion to the nonmovant. In addition, *508the trial court abused its discretion by deciding a material issue of fact contrary to its limited function when deciding a motion for summary judgment.

The fundamental principles of summary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Fortner Enterprises, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API