Legal Opinion

King v. Richardson

District Court, M.D. North Carolina

Decided July 20, 1942No. 128 G-CivilPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, District Judge.

This unfortunate litigation finds its origin in the divergent interpretations by eminent lawyers of North Carolina of Item V of the last will and testament of the late Lunsford Richardson. He was the founder of Vick Chemical Company. When his will was written in 1917, he and his sons Smith and Lunsford, Jr., were conducting the business as a partnership in which he owned 51%. Before his death in 1919, the business was incorporated but the stock had not been issued. He was not only a successful business man but an outstanding lay leader and active worker in the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. Bank of New York & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. LOUISA & MARIA SETONSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  4. United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Corp. Commission v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1927

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. King v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. Young Women's Christian Ass'n of Asheville v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. King v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API