Legal Opinion

Nicklos Drilling Co. v. Cowart

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 29, 1991No. Nos. 89-4944, 90-4022PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Today we sit en banc to resolve a conflict in the law of our Circuit. In the cases consolidated on this appeal, two panels of our Court held that section 33 of the Long-shore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (LHWCA), 33 U.S.C. § 933 (1988), conditions eligibility for continuing LHWCA benefits on the employer’s and the employer’s insurance carrier’s prior written approval of any settlement between an injured employee and a third person for less than his LHWCA compensation entitlement; 1 and we further held that this approval requirement applies regardless of whether the employer or the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Public Employees Retirement System of Ohio v. BettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. Rodriguez-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Ingalls Shipbuilding, Inc. v. Asbestos HealthCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  3. Variable Annuity Life Ins. Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. Mario Garcia v. The Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Ankney v. FranchCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API