Agricultural Workers Mutual Auto Insurance Co. v. Dawson
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
DUNAGAN, Chief Justice.
As the appellee has filed no brief in this case, we accept as correct the statements contained in appellant’s brief relating to the facts and the record. Rule 419, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure; Gonzales v. Gonzales, 224 S.W.2d 520 (Tex.Civ.App., 1949, San Antonio, writ ref.).
It appears from appellant’s brief that plaintiff-appellee (the insured) claiming under the “Physical Damage” coverage of an automobile insurance policy, sought indemnity from defendant-appellant (the insurer) for damage caused to his car by a collision. The case was tried before a jury which, in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gonzales v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- Radford v. Automobile Underwriters of AmericaTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Home Ins. Co. v. KetcheyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Automobile Underwriters of America v. RadfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Riley v. National Auto Insurance CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchaeferTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York v. Underwood, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1990
- Jessica Singleton v. Elephant Insurance ComCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Crawford v. ModosCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
- Great Texas County Mutual Insurance Co. v. Lewis, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.