Legal Opinion

London v. Sony Music Publishing

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 28, 2025No. 1:25-cv-06647Unknown

1Opinion

TMdve SPalled LACleNOadlit s CALCTISIOIM POQUCSL. (Doc. 10.) The parties are directed to meet and confer concerning the proper parties so that the Plaintiff may amend the complaint. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to correct Plaintiff's name in the case caption as "Sena London." UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SO ORDERED: 8/28/2025 Sena London, Plaintiff, iy f a F 4 HON. VERNON S. BRODERICK V. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SONY MUSIC PUBLISHING, a subsidiary of Sony Corporation, Defendant Case No. 25-cv-06647 PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Daggett v. Commission on Governmental Ethics & Election PracticesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
  2. Carl Zeiss, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API